On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:00:14 -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Admittedly SA is tweakable to reduce FP's considerably, but being > a SA user the 1/25,000 FP rate doesn't choke me up at all. If it's > true, it's quite impressive. Very few spamfilters can claim a FP > rate anywhere near that low. The concern I have is what happens to false positives? They don't get past the firewall, so what if that's something important? -- Raquel ============================================================ We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't. --Frank A. Clark
