greping a quick phrase or word, vs running the masscheck againt the actual rule.
Can have different outcomes. grep -c force\.com will hit more then running against a rule like URI I_AM_PUDDING /\bforce\.com\b/i Simple example, but I think it explains it. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Daulton, Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:12 AM >To: Robert Menschel >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: NOSEND IMG Attribute in HTML Email > > >Thanks Bob. > >Could you elaborate on what a corpus scan is vs. a mass-check. > >Thanks, > >Doug Daulton >Email Systems Manager >Email Marketing | Graphic Arts >MGM MIRAGE Advertising, Inc. >www.mgmmirage.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:12 PM >To: Daulton, Douglas >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: NOSEND IMG Attribute in HTML Email > >Hello Douglas, > >Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 12:02:54 PM, you wrote: > >DD> I've been researching the NOSEND attribute of IMG tags. >The results > >DD> have been mixed and can be found at the following URL. > >DD> http://www.emailcrew.com/index.php?p=10 > >DD> Does anyone else have something to add? Is NOSEND a SPAM negative >DD> or positive SPAM flag? What purpose does it actually serve? > >Quick corpus scan (not a proper mass-check) for "nosend=" gives 21 ham >and 26 spam. Therefore not a useful flag one way or the other here. > >Bob Menschel > > > > > > > >
