On Monday 30 August 2004 10:24 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote: > On Monday 30 August 2004 9:34 pm, John Andersen wrote: > > On Monday 30 August 2004 05:40 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote: > > > I am getting a about 2% of my mail that is clean HAM marked as spam by > > > BAYES_99 as being 99-100% spam. > > > > > > What can I do about it? How does BAYES_99 pick spam? I assume its a > > > baysian filter.... > > > > > > Rob > > > > You need to save these mails that are falsely called spam > > and use sa-learn to teach bays database that they are not > > spam. Bayes filters need to be trained before they can > > be trusted 100%
I have no reason to understand why I had to retrain SA last night, but that trick seems to have taught it a good lesson. Thanks for the reminder to try retraining it. Rob -- Linux Desktop user since 2000, Home networker since shortly after. Linux User #183693 http://counter.li.org/
