Feature Requests item #818567, was opened at 2003-10-06 13:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pwagland
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Wagland (pwagland)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Add IDLE support for IMAP

Initial Comment:
It would be very useful if the imap filter could use
the IDLE support of LDAP on the folders that it
monitors for new messages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Paul Wagland (pwagland)
Date: 2005-12-05 13:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=19812

http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc/rfc2177.txt

The IDLE command is fairly standard amongst IMAP servers,
although there are varying degrees of support. Cyrus and
Exchange both have very good support for it, as do courier,
binc, and dovecot. However, with the last three it also
requires a bit of OS support for decent efficiency since
they do not use their own internal database.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2005-12-05 10:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'm not sure what this feature is; could you elaborate or
point to a link?  (If it's a non-standard IMAP feature, then
the chances of implementing it is low - the IMAP filter is
complicated enough trying to support all the standard ways
that IMAP can work).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702
_______________________________________________
Spambayes-bugs mailing list
Spambayes-bugs@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-bugs

Reply via email to