Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-12 09:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2007-08-10 09:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Originator: YES Looks like time to do a little cleanup. This has been fully implemented for awhile in 1.1 including configuration in the SpamBayes Manager dialog. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-03 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I've checked the changes into latest CVS. The next step will be to provide a Notifications tab in SpamBayes Manager for configuring the sounds. Until then, you can configure it according to the original instructions in this patch. The only difference is that I placed the settings in a separate section called "Notification" instead of in the "Experimental" section. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 18:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Kenny - how would you feel about committing this to CVS Head at some point? We still get regular requests for it, and I don't see that it could hurt going into 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 18:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. There are a *lot* of experimental/new features that will be present in the next release that weren't in 1.0a7 as a result of dumping the 1_0_release branch and the current popularity of 'x-' options. I suppose these don't effect the plug-in in any obvious way, but they are still there in the background (apart from the web interface changes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release. A branch sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy discussed earlier on spambayes-dev. Either a single branch for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine with me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 _______________________________________________ Spambayes-bugs mailing list Spambayes-bugs@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-bugs
