I am using various POP3 clients at home (Outlook Express, Eudora) with Spambayes Proxy installed. All is well regarding to spam filtering.
I'm now in the process of switching to Thunderbird 1.0 and one of its claims to fame is the Bayesian spam filter.
So, from people's experience - how good is TB's filter compared to SB?
Thanks for the reminder. I'm using Thunderbird 0.9 and completely forgot about the 'Junk' filter. I've just switched it on now and will see if it works on the 'Unsure' messages left by SpamBayes, sort of a second level of spam filtering. (hmmm, probably have to play with my T'bird filters as well)
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.8 - Release Date: 12/8/2004
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
