Tony Meyer wrote: > This shouldn't be a problem with 1.0.1 - it was caused by a change > (to CVS Head) that I made to fix the problem of messages sneaking > through sb_server. It would only have effected those running from > CVS. 1.0.1 splits the response on the first newline, which ought to > work whatever data is after the +OK.
I'm not so sure. The problem I saw was precisely *because* sb_server was only splitting on the first newline. After splitting, it assumed that the entire status response up to that first newline would be "+OK". In my case, the server was including additional information on the same line, separated from the "+OK" with a space character, not a newline. -- Kenny Pitt _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
