Thank you. I don't know why, but the correction as inserted by me does not appear to work. Could you please send me a corrected sb_imapfilter.py after all?
Rafael Scholl At 02:51 18.07.2005, Tony Meyer wrote: > > I think you solved my spambayes problem but then forgot to > > send me the answer. I am sorry for pushing if you are simply > > delayed, but life without a functional spam filter is not picnic. > >Sorry, I've been working away from the normal places over the last few days, >and so didn't have access to the patch. I would have got to it today. > >The change you need to make is very small: > >*** sb_imapfilter.py 3 Jul 2005 08:53:28 -0000 1.62 >--- sb_imapfilter.py 8 Jul 2005 03:24:40 -0000 1.63 >*************** >*** 273,278 **** > "unsure_folder", > "ham_folder"]: >! self.select(options["imap", fol]) >! self.expunge() > # Expunge messages from the ham and spam training folders. > for fol_list in ["ham_train_folders", >--- 273,280 ---- > "unsure_folder", > "ham_folder"]: >! folder_name = options["imap", fol] >! if folder_name: >! self.select(folder_name) >! self.expunge() > # Expunge messages from the ham and spam training folders. > for fol_list in ["ham_train_folders", > >=Tony.Meyer > >-- >Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies >(reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. >http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. * Passed viruscheck by Kaspersky Lab Business Enterprise Scanner * _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
