> There is no function at this point to always flag a unique sequence of > characters as non-spam.
And I'm pretty sure there are no plans to ever have one (because, as Tim described, you can do this already very simply). > I might suggest, however, > that you implement a rule in your mailer that looks for that sequence > and simply files it off to a folder before the rule that moves flagged > spam gets ahold of it. That way, whether or not spambayes has flagged > it as spam is of no consequence. > > Generally speaking, spambayes flags mail as likely spam or not, but > it's > up to your mailer to do something with that information. If you're > using outlook, then the spambayes plugin is a bit more proactive than > that, but that's the only exception. (I realise this isn't relevant for the OP, but:) You can do this with the Outlook plug-in as well - it fires *after* all the Outlook rules, so if you have a rule to move the message to another folder, which isn't filtered, then SpamBayes will never see the message. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
