Scott> [-] I found that SpamBayes to be much less accurate "out of the
Scott> box" than other free anti-spam products I've tested. It's my
Scott> opinion that SpamBayes took much longer to train than I expected
Scott> in order to reach a level of usefulness. I have fed SpamBayes
Scott> well over 1000 spam messages.
How many hams have you trained on? What sort of settings do you have for
the thresholds? Out-of-the-box the spam and ham thresholds are pretty
conservative.
Skip
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
