> Evidence strongly indicates that the only active superset list of > folders before opening is within Spambayes and for regeneration > purposes. Outlook and MAPI never did this on their own.
I'm getting quite lost :) Outlook and MAPI must have had them open before they could even be selected in spambayes. > > All pst manipulation happens inside MAPI. MAPI exposes all > > of the Outlook items as a big database. Spambayes never > > deals with pst files directly > > (indeed, spambayes doesn't even know they *are* in a PST file > > - they may > > well reside on an Exchange server). > > Your assumptions simply are not entirely correct. They are facts, as the source code proves. <snip lots of stuff telling me I'm wrong about how spambayes works> > Unrelated to Outlook Rules. I did not cite these. They seem wholly > unchanged buy the other mess. Yes, I was just trying to help explain what you are seeing. > It us unrelated to Outlook and 100% correlated to Spambayes doing a > regeneration when some previously used folders are not already "open" > for this in Outlook. Outlook had/has no problem of this kind. I'm afraid I can't think of any more advice to offer. Good luck, Mark _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
