Dave> OK, I have some hams that scored as high as 0.85
I will assert without any further evidence that you have one or more
classification mistakes in your database. Can you post the evidence header
from that message?
Dave> Is everything between the ham_cutoff and spam_cutoff classified as
Dave> unsure? Moving my spam_cutoff to 0.86 probably would make only a
Dave> small dent in my results.
If everything is properly trained SpamBayes should produce a distribution of
scores with a bimodal distribution, hams near 0.0 and spams near 1.0. A ham
scoring above 0.5 tells me that you have classified a number of hams as
spam.
Skip
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
