On Mon, August 18, 2008 08:22, Fu wrote: > The fact that this has been known about and left for three years is > insane. Fixing DEP issues is not difficult, unless of course, the > software has intentionally created this behavior. If that's the case with > SpamBayes, it should be stated outright so that people can make informed > decisions about using the software. I'm certainly not going to continue > using it while it requires me to open the front door to my computer and > invite people to come take advantage of me.
You are absolutely right, but I think there is nobody available that has all of the below: * experience with python programming * experience with outlook programming * enough spare time to work on the code. --> this might be the most important thing SpamBayes is not a commercial product, it is a "hobby" project that the people who made it were kind enough to share with us. If you don't want to use it, then don't do that. I'm a happy Linux user and I don't have any of those problems so SpamBayes is perfect for me. There is nothing insane about not fixing a known bug. The issue is documented, if you want to pick it up and fix it, you will earn good karma. Or just telling on which line in which file there may be a problem. That is the great thing about open source: you are allowed to fix it! -- Amedee _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Info/Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
