SC seems to have found 3 addresses in the versatel.net domain--abuse,
hostmaster, and marct.  "Abuse" bounced, so SC substituted the usual
stat-track version.  But why didn't any report go to the other two?

http://spamcop.net/sc?id=z19087727zcc36f33cd5df2595d8fb74345e1eb759z


Parsing header:

Received: from hostserver.successmail.hlt.it ([62.59.4.95]) by dialup.oar.net 
(8.9.3/8.9.1)
with SMTP id OAA28143 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:39:44 -0400 (EDT)
Possible spammer: 62.59.4.95
[show] "nslookup 95.4.59.62.dialups.mail-abuse.org." (checking ip) not found
[show] "nslookup hostserver.successmail.hlt.it" (checking ip) ip not found;
hostserver.successmail.hlt.it discarded as fake.
[show] "dig hostserver.successmail.hlt.it mx" (digging for mail exchanger) Can't find
mailserver.
[show] "dig successmail.hlt.it mx" (digging for mail exchanger) Can't find mailserver.
Taking name from IP...
[show] "nslookup 62.59.4.95" (getting name) no name
[show] "nslookup 95.4.59.62.blackholes.mail-abuse.org." (checking ip) not found
[show] "nslookup 95.4.59.62.inputs.orbs.org." (checking ip) not found
[show] "nslookup 95.4.59.62.dialups.mail-abuse.org." (checking ip) not found
Received line accepted


Tracking message source:62.59.4.95:
[show] "nslookup 62.59.4.95" (getting name) no name
[show] "dig -x 62.59.4.95 soa" (digging for start of authority) - not found
[show] "dig -x 62.59.4 soa" (digging for start of authority) - not found
[refresh/show] Cached whois for 62.59.4.95:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse.net versatel.net = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse.net versatel.net = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces (11 sent : 8 bounces)
Using abuse#[EMAIL PROTECTED] for statistical tracking.


Statistics:
abuse#[EMAIL PROTECTED] score:18
62.59.4.95 score:0


Report Spam to:
Re:62.59.4.95 (Administrator of network where email originates)

  To: abuse#[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Notes)



_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help

Reply via email to