I read all of the previous "won't send report" thread (which I had started.) On reparsing the link, I get the following: Report already sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Would send message source reports to: Re:208.147.127.119 (Administrator of network where email originates) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re:208.147.127.119 (Administrator of IP block - statistics only) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The last several lines confirm the *not sent* reports, but don't say why they were not sent. Again - still no explanation of the "silent" report. Does "silent" mean that no report was sent but Julian's record keeping logs the fact that they *should* have been sent??? Following is a quote from the previous thread: "this is now fixed. I've been making some changes - note the new "IP block owner" silent reports. And introducing new bugs too, of course ;)" I don't remember anything about "IP block owner" (and what does this mean - is there a FAQ on this?) ----previous thread----- "wazoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 9cvnvr$el5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9cvnvr$el5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Again, see previous thread in this group "won't send report" > though noting that the "silent reports" still hasn't been defined yet > in this newsgroup. > > Was stated in the SpamCop group that Julian is just > testing, but not sure where that data came from. > > "Anon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 9cvasf$9af$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9cvasf$9af$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > ****All were marked to send > > > > ****Why weren't reports sent to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > since these also were checkmarked to be contacted? > > > > If, in fact reports *were* sent, why weren't they listed in the report? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ SpamCop-Help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
