This wouldn't be a right-hand whitelist exactly -- spamdyke already 
supports RHSWLs by checking the rDNS name against the list.

Supporting DynDNS would require an extra step.  It would function like 
an IP whitelist, except the IP addresses would be found by querying a 
list of FQDNs.  For example, if this feature was used to whitelist 
"mail.example.dyndns.com", spamdyke would perform a DNS A record for 
"mail.example.dyndns.com".  If that IP address was 11.22.33.44, spamdyke 
would add 11.22.33.44 to its IP whitelist.  From that point on, spamdyke 
would behave as it does now.

At least, that's my understanding of how DynDNS needs to be supported.  
It would increase the number of DNS queries, so it would have to be used 
sparingly.

-- Sam Clippinger

Eric Shubert wrote:
> Are you simply talking about a right-hand whitelist?
>
> That could be useful in some situations. For instance, I recently came
> across a mailer who was being rejected due to DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE, so I
> whitelisted the IP (instead of turning off that check). I would rather
> whitelist the domain name though, in case they change their server's IP
> address (which I figure is a fair chance of happening given that it's
> presently not quite correct).
>
> I don't think this should apply to relays (non-local mail) though.
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> Sam Clippinger wrote:
>   
>> SMTP AUTH is definitely the best option, if you can configure postfix to 
>> perform it for outbound email.
>>
>> I don't use DynDNS myself -- what would be required to support it?  
>> Would spamdyke need to find the IP address(es) of a (list of) DynDNS 
>> name(s), then add those IP address(es) to the whitelist?  If that's all 
>> it would take, I don't think that would be very hard.
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>
>> Christian Aust wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm using the latest release of spamdyke, and it's working great -  
>>> thanks a lot.
>>>
>>> Now I'd like to have my home server relay it's mail through the main  
>>> mail system. Spamdyke blocks the connecton with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS,  
>>> because the home system certainly connects using a non-static IP which  
>>> happens to have the ip in it's RDNS name. spamdyke is working  
>>> perfectly and is doing what it has been told.
>>>
>>> But how could I allow my satellite server to actually send mail  
>>> through this relay? If I could instruct spamdyke to check the IP  
>>> against some given dyndns name (and allow if the IPs match) it would  
>>> be all right, but AFAIK spamdyke doesn't offer such option. Or, does it?
>>>
>>> Any other ideas? BTW: I'm running postfix on the satellite and  
>>> (obviously) qmail on the main server. Best regards,
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>       
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to