Yes, but, by definition, any e-mail that is "ALLOWED" on a domain that has greylisting enabled, is an "ALLOWED GREYLIST", since all e-mails would be greylisted prior to being allowed. :-)
Sam's point about the e-mail possibly being sent sufficiently delayed that it is actually in a different log, thereby having the two entries in different logs is something I hadn't thought of, and makes sense enough to make the changes you're suggesting. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Marcin Orlowski > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:17 AM > To: spamdyke users > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes > > Michael Colvin wrote: > > Doesn't it already log "DENIED GREYLISTED" when it greylists an > > address, then when it is sent again, and passes the > greylist test, it > > logs "ALLOWED"... Doesn't that already identify greylisted e-mails? > > No. One means message is graylisted, the other, message has > passed. It does not mean "message was posted again due to > graylist" as ALLOWED may be there i.e. due to whitelists for > example. To find out which ALLOWED was formerly > DENIED_GREYLISTED you need to play with logs yourself and try > to match records. > > Regards, > -- > "Daddy, what "Formatting drive C:" means?"... > > Marcin http://wfmh.org.pl/carlos/ > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
