The last timeout bug (that I know of) was fixed in 3.1.8. I haven't received any reports of timeout problems in 4.0 (yet). If you can trigger this problem with 4.0, please try to capture a full log and let's arrange some way to get it to me (my server won't accept 50 MB emails, sorry).
-- Sam Clippinger Eric Shubert wrote: > Felix Buenemann wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to ask about your opinion on a good value for idle-timeout-secs >> – I've started with a value of 60 seconds, which strangely caused >> TIMEOUTs during mail delivery of large mails (over 10MB) from clinet >> MTAs with SMTP AUTH (specifically the mail path was: Client MS Exchange >> (DSL upstream 512 kbps) -> Spamdyke SMTP AUTH -> qmail -> target MTA). >> >> I have now raised the idle timeout value to 180 secs, which seems to fix >> the problem for now, but I wonder what happens with eg. 50 or 100 MB mails. >> >> The strange thing is that the idle and not the connection timeout got >> triggered, because supposedly there is never such a long period of no >> traffic during sending a large mail. >> >> Best Regards, >> Felix Buenemann >> >> > > What version are you running? There was a bug in most 3.x versions that > would timeout on large emails when there was no interruption. Check the > documentation's change log to verify which version it was fixed in. There > haven't been any reports of this problem with 4.x TTBOMK. Of course, Sam > would know for sure. > > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
