I've found that using DynDNS services along with a regular dynamic address is more affordable than going the static IP route (no pun intended). Such a service level is adequate for most SMBs, but not appropriate for mission critial environments.
Joe Canner wrote: > Sorry, I ignored the first part of your post. Our mail server is already > in-house with a static IP. However, the outbound mail service idea may be a > useful way to approach this problem. If it gets worse and the ISP doesn't > do anything about it, that may be worth investigating. > > -----Original Message----- > From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org > [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 15:40 > To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis > > A possible solution to this problem is to bring your mail server > in-house, and/or use an affordable outbound mail service such as > DynDNS's Mailhop Outbound. If you don't have a static IP address > in-house, DynDNS's CustomDNS service solves that problem affordably. > > Disclaimer: I'm not associated with DynDNS, but I do use and recommend > their services. > > Joe Canner wrote: >> Yes, Level 1 protection seems reasonable. We passed level 1 but failed >> level 2 and 3 because of other clients using our ISP. I've only had one >> recipient so far block us because of this, but I fear this might be just > the >> beginning. >> >> I agree that ISPs should take some responsibility for their clients' spam. >> I hope our ISP will respond to our complaint. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org >> [mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] On Behalf Of Kulkarni > Shantanu >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 14:44 >> To: spamdyke users >> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis >> >> yes, but i use their level 1 protection. level 2 & 3 are indeed >> aggressive. but i am also of the opinion that isps are partly responsible >> for their clients using their bandwidth to spam and they should >> blacklist these customers and take legal action against them. >> >> Shantanu > > -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
