Hi, at least 10 blacklists would have stopped this spam before accepting it (see http://www.kloth.net/services/dnsbl.php)
For a smtp mail relay test of your own mail server open a telnet session from your server's shell to rt.njabl.org on port 2500: telnet rt.njabl.org 2500 But i am sorry i have no idea, why this email wasn't blocked by spamdyke. perhaps enabling full-log-dir for some time could help to see what happens http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#FULL_LOGGING Regards, Arne Magnus Ringdahl schrieb am 16.12.2009 15:07: > Hi. > I just recieved a viagra spam again. From my own email address. > > Dec 16 14:11:12 web01 /var/qmail/bin/relaylock[28512]: > /var/qmail/bin/relaylock: mail from 125.178.185.144:3512 (not defined) > Dec 16 14:11:13 web01 spamdyke[28509]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: (unknown) to: > (unknown) origin_ip: 125.178.185.144 origin_rdns: (unknown) auth: (unknown) > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: Handlers Filter > before-queue for qmail started ... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: > from=kundtja...@domain.tld > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: to=kundtja...@domain.tld > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Starting spf filter... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Error code: (2) Could not find > a valid SPF record > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Failed to query MAIL-FROM: No > DNS data for 'domain.tld'. > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: SPF result: none > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: SPF status: PASS > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue[28539]: scan: the > message(drweb.tmp.MdrGAT) sent by kundtja...@domain.tld to > kundtja...@domain.tld is passed > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.825046 new msg 4254303 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.825046 info msg 4254303: bytes > 2349 from<kundtja...@domain.tld> qp 28540 uid 2020 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: Handlers Filter > before-local for qmail started ... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: > from=kundtja...@domain.tld > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: to=kundtja...@domain.tld > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: mailbox: > /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/kundtjanst > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.845046 starting delivery 3717: > msg 4254303 to local 98-kundtja...@domain.tld > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.845046 status: local 1/10 remote > 0/20 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 delivery 3717: success: > did_0+0+2/ > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 status: local 0/10 remote > 0/20 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 end msg 4254303 > > This is the header of the mail: > > Received: (qmail 28540 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2009 14:11:15 +0100 > Received-SPF: none (no valid SPF record) > Received: from unknown (HELO ?125.178.185.144?) (125.178.185.144) > by 1.2.3.4 with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 16 Dec 2009 14:11:15 +0100 > From: Pfizer ® Customer Service<kundtja...@domain.tld> > To: kundtja...@domain.tld > Subject: Special offer kundtja...@e-s.se receive 70% OFF on Pfizer. > > Where 1.2.3.4 is the ip of my pleskserver. Don't know what it means, but > the server is not open for relay. > > Kind Regards. > M > > And i have @domain.tld in blacklisted_senders file. So why the hell does > these keep coming? > > Ulrich C. Manns skrev: >> If your users will use authentification there is no problem by >> blocking subdomains also. ?¿? >> >> You could add /reject-ip-in-cc-rdns/ to your /spamdyke.conf/ also. >> >> Regards, >> Ulrich >> >> Am 16.12.2009 um 07:27 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: >> >>> Believe me, have hav been reading that documentation many times. >>> This is what i read: >>> "One form of wildcard address is supported. All usernames within a >>> domain (and its subdomains) may be blocked by a line starting with |@|. >>> For example, if the file contained the following entry:| @example.com| >>> spamdyke will block mail to |f...@example.com|, |f...@mail.example.com|, >>> |bar...@mail.internal.example.com|, etc." >>> >>> Kind Regards >>> M >>> >>> Ulrich C. Manns skrev: >>>> Look at the documentation >>>> here: >>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_ADDRESSES >>>> >>>> >>>> Spam comes from /paul.si...@artgarfunkel.com >>>> <mailto:/paul.si...@artgarfunkel.com> >>>> <mailto:paul.si...@artgarfunkel.com>/ >>>> >>>> Add: /sender-blacklist-entry=.artgarfunkel.com/ >>>> or: /sender-blacklist-ent...@artgarfunkel.com >>>> <mailto:/sender-blacklist-ent...@artgarfunkel.com> >>>> <mailto:sender-blacklist-ent...@artgarfunkel.com>/ >>>> to your /spamdyke.conf/ >>>> >>>> Be shure that your user uses authentification! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ulrich >>>> >>>> Am 15.12.2009 um 22:36 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: >>>> >>>>> Hi, and thanks for your reply. >>>>> Should i use a "." instead of a "@" as a wildcard? >>>>> >>>>> Kind Regards >>>>> M >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ulrich C. Manns skrev: >>>>>> Just add your domain to the senders blacklist with a . as wildchard. >>>>>> Example: u...@spam.com<mailto:u...@spam.com> >>>>>> <mailto:u...@spam.com> -> .spam.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Your Users should use authentification. So they can send e-mail >>>>>> through spamdyke. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ulrich >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 15.12.2009 um 21:54 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>> I have been using spamdyke for quite some time now, and it reduces my >>>>>>> spammails alot. >>>>>>> But it have a hell of a problem with spammers (often viagra) the >>>>>>> spoof >>>>>>> the localdomains. >>>>>>> I often get spammails where the sending address is the same as my >>>>>>> receiving address. >>>>>>> And i dint know how to block them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have pasted my configurationfiles so you coould see if there is >>>>>>> some >>>>>>> issues. Using Debian and Plesk 9.2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> spamdyke.conf >>>>>>> ------------------------------------ >>>>>>> log-level=verbose >>>>>>> filter-level=normal >>>>>>> local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts >>>>>>> max-recipients=20 >>>>>>> idle-timeout-secs=60 >>>>>>> graylist-level=only >>>>>>> graylist-dir=/var/qmail/spamdyke/greylist >>>>>>> graylist-min-secs=300 >>>>>>> graylist-max-secs=1814400 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sender-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_senders >>>>>>> rdns-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_rdns >>>>>>> ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_ip >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sender-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_senders >>>>>>> recipient-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_recipients >>>>>>> ip-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_ip >>>>>>> dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reject-empty-rdns >>>>>>> reject-unresolvable-rdns >>>>>>> greeting-delay-secs=5 >>>>>>> reject-missing-sender-mx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> policy-url=http://www.your-domain-here.com/spam_policy >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> smtp_psa >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> service smtp >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> socket_type = stream >>>>>>> protocol = tcp >>>>>>> wait = no >>>>>>> disable = no >>>>>>> user = root >>>>>>> instances = UNLIMITED >>>>>>> env = SMTPAUTH=1 >>>>>>> server = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env >>>>>>> server_args = -Rt0 /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -f >>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke.conf /var/qmail/bin/relaylock >>>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd >>>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth /var/qmail/bin/true >>>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw >>>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/true >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The whitelisted_ip file contains the mailservers ip-addresses. >>>>>>> The blacklisted_senders file contains the localdomains (@domain.tld). >>>>>>> The blacklisted_words contains alot of words like .t-dialin.net, >>>>>>> .t-ipconnect.de, .in-addr.arpa, .dhcp, .net, in-addr.arpa, dhcp, >>>>>>> dynamic, and so on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I understand the spamdyke filters that they work something like >>>>>>> this. If >>>>>>> the sending server is listed in whitelisted_ip the mail passes the >>>>>>> filter. If its not listed in whitelisted_ip it then checks the >>>>>>> blabklisted_senders if the sending address is listed it drops the >>>>>>> mail. >>>>>>> Is that correct? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is a sample of the mail.log of a spammail that in my opinion >>>>>>> should >>>>>>> have been dropped but passes all filters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:55 web01 spamdyke[24928]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: >>>>>>> (unknown) to: >>>>>>> (unknown) origin_ip: 80.179.197.221 origin_rdns: >>>>>>> 80.179.197.221.cable.012.net.il auth: (unknown) >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: Handlers Filter >>>>>>> before-queue for qmail started ... >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: >>>>>>> from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il >>>>>>> <mailto:from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il> >>>>>>> <mailto:from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: >>>>>>> to=i...@domain.tld<mailto:to=i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:to=i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: Starting spf filter... >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: SPF result: neutral >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: SPF status: PASS >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.491935 new msg 4252544 >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.491935 info msg 4252544: >>>>>>> bytes >>>>>>> 2246 from<vioirecyf8...@012.net.il<mailto:vioirecyf8...@012.net.il> >>>>>>> <mailto:vioirecyf8...@012.net.il>> qp 24948 uid 2020 >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: Handlers Filter >>>>>>> before-local for qmail started ... >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: >>>>>>> from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il >>>>>>> <mailto:from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il> >>>>>>> <mailto:from=vioirecyf8...@012.net.il> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: >>>>>>> to=i...@domain.tld<mailto:to=i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:to=i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: mailbox: >>>>>>> /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/info >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.515935 starting delivery >>>>>>> 2744: >>>>>>> msg 4252544 to local 9-i...@domain.tld<mailto:9-i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:9-i...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.515935 status: local 1/10 >>>>>>> remote >>>>>>> 0/20 >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 delivery 2744: >>>>>>> success: >>>>>>> did_0+0+2/ >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 status: local 0/10 >>>>>>> remote >>>>>>> 0/20 >>>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 end msg 4252544 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:22:57 web01 /var/qmail/bin/relaylock[6350]: >>>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/relaylock: mail from 125.25.15.31:52521 >>>>>>> (125.25.15.31.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net) >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:22:59 web01 spamdyke[6349]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: >>>>>>> (unknown) to: >>>>>>> (unknown) origin_ip: 125.25.15.31 origin_rdns: >>>>>>> 125.25.15.31.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net auth: (unknown) >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:01 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: Handlers Filter >>>>>>> before-queue for qmail started ... >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: >>>>>>> from=kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:from=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:from=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: >>>>>>> to=kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:to=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:to=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Starting spf filter... >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Error code: (2) Could not >>>>>>> find a >>>>>>> valid SPF record >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Failed to query MAIL-FROM: No >>>>>>> DNS data for 'domain.tld'. >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: SPF result: none >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: SPF status: PASS >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue[6356]: scan: the >>>>>>> message(drweb.tmp.Wu6OR3) sent by kundtja...@domain.tld >>>>>>> <mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld> to >>>>>>> kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld> is passed >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.819935 new msg 4253887 >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.819935 info msg 4253887: >>>>>>> bytes >>>>>>> 2469 from<kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:kundtja...@domain.tld>> qp >>>>>>> 6357 uid 2020 >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: Handlers Filter >>>>>>> before-local for qmail started ... >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: >>>>>>> from=kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:from=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:from=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: >>>>>>> to=kundtja...@domain.tld<mailto:to=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:to=kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: mailbox: >>>>>>> /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/kundtjanst >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.855935 starting delivery >>>>>>> 2998: >>>>>>> msg 4253887 to local 98-kundtja...@domain.tld >>>>>>> <mailto:98-kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> <mailto:98-kundtja...@domain.tld> >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.855935 status: local 1/10 >>>>>>> remote >>>>>>> 0/20 >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 delivery 2998: >>>>>>> success: >>>>>>> did_0+0+2/ >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 status: local 0/10 >>>>>>> remote >>>>>>> 0/20 >>>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 end msg 4253887 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How can i check that smtp_auth is working? Im starting to wonder that >>>>>>> it's not. >>>>>>> I hope someone have the time to answer. I have been struggling with >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> for a long time withput getting rid of those annoying mails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>>> M >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eduard Svarc skrev: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> these keywords .net and .com are used just for testing if IP is in >>>>>>>> reverse DNS listed. Is not done against normal reverse DNS >>>>>>>> records for >>>>>>>> servers like mail.somedomain.net<http://mail.somedomain.net> >>>>>>>> <http://mail.somedomain.net>. So >>>>>>>> in combination with keyword >>>>>>>> reject-ip-in-cc-rdns and .net in file >>>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file it will reject mail >>>>>>>> from 242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net >>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> >>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> because that sender will be >>>>>>>> positively tested as not valid reverse DNS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> use just net without that '.' is not suficient because SPAMDYKE use >>>>>>>> this '.' as flag for testing end of string only. So listing .com and >>>>>>>> .net does magic for SPAMDYKE when it testing IP in reverse DNS for >>>>>>>> country code DNS, like .it,, .uk etc it does same for .com and .net. >>>>>>>> Personally I did add into that file other ones special domains like >>>>>>>> .eu, .org, .info, .biz. These should not be used by ISP >>>>>>>> providers for >>>>>>>> assigning reverse names, but who knows. Anyway it doesn't hurt my >>>>>>>> configuration and I'm preparded. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eduard Švarc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DATA Intertech s.r.o. >>>>>>>> Kladenská 46 >>>>>>>> 160 00 Praha 6 >>>>>>>> Czech Republic >>>>>>>> tel. +420-235365267, fax +420-235361446 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org >>>>>>>> <mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org> >>>>>>>> <mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org> wrote on 14.12.2009 >>>>>>>> 09:55:45: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks Eduard Švarc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Same query as david stiller raised, .com, .net are valid domain >>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @400000004b25fa572bd181a4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from >>>>>>>>> <fx...@bmelaw. >>>>>>>>> com::> remote<microsof-7b1919:unknown:94.179.29.242> rcpt >>>>>>>>> <validdomainu...@mydomain.com<mailto:validdomainu...@mydomain.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:validdomainu...@mydomain.com>> : found existing recipient >>>>>>>>> @400000004b25fa572bd2316c spamdyke[27021]: ALLOWED from: >>>>>>>>> fx...@bmelaw.com<mailto:fx...@bmelaw.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:fx...@bmelaw.com> to: >>>>>>>>> validdomainu...@mydomain.com<mailto:validdomainu...@mydomain.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:validdomainu...@mydomain.com> origin_ip: 94.179. >>>>>>>>> 29.242 origin_rdns: 242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net >>>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> >>>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> auth: (unknown) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the above ip is listed in rbl , >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IP Address Lookup >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [image removed] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is not listed in the SBL >>>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is listed in the PBL, in the following records: >>>>>>>>> PBL239543 >>>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is not listed in the XBL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this doesnt look like false positive >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: Eduard Svarc<esv...@intertech.cz >>>>>>>>> <mailto:esv...@intertech.cz> <mailto:esv...@intertech.cz>> >>>>>>>>> To: spamdyke users<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>>>>>>> <mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could give >>>>>>>>> you a lot positive false spam. 2nd you completely have >>>>>>>>> commented out >>>>>>>>> best thing in SPAMDYKE. Is sniffing IPs in reverse DNS. Most of >>>>>>>>> bots >>>>>>>>> and spams comming from Internet zombies. Here are my advices: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1 - comment out dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org >>>>>>>>> 2 - uncoment reject-empty-rdns, reject-ip-in-cc-rdns, reject- >>>>>>>>> missing-sender-mx and reject-unresolvable-rdns >>>>>>>>> 3- into /etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients add your domain in >>>>>>>>> format >>>>>>>>> @your-domain (it will block all mails like to: n...@your-domain >>>>>>>>> from: >>>>>>>>> n...@your-domain) >>>>>>>>> 4- into /etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file put these >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> words : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> dsl >>>>>>>>> .com >>>>>>>>> .net >>>>>>>>> broadband >>>>>>>>> dynamic >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I could guarantee you will fall bellow 1% of SPAM with nearly zero >>>>>>>>> false positives. Of course someone who can't follow certain >>>>>>>>> guidelines for theirs servers will not be able to send you e-mails >>>>>>>>> at all. But you can easily handle it by adding IP's in >>>>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip or adding senders into >>>>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_senders >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I stop using any RBLS services ages ago, they are way unreliable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Good luck, >>>>>>>>> Eduard Švarc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> DATA Intertech s.r.o. >>>>>>>>> Kladenská 46 >>>>>>>>> 160 00 Praha 6 >>>>>>>>> Czech Republic >>>>>>>>> tel. +420-235365267, fax +420-235361446 _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
