Yes, it does work. Dossy has been doing work with the client directly, she has been emailing him as tests also and so far he has confirmed that the issue is with spamdyke TLS from what I have gathered.
On 6/10/2011 12:20 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > I'm under the impression that if you use > tls-level=none > in your spamdyke config, then it works. If you haven't tried this, > please do. > > On 06/10/2011 09:11 AM, ron wrote: >> When I disable spamdyke, qmail accepts the emails just fine, its when >> spamdyke is enabled that >> the emails can not be received. Cert or no cert I wouldnt think makes a >> difference, right? >> >> >> On 6/10/2011 11:15 AM, Jose Galvez wrote: >>> But the first thing is to know where dosen't work. >>> >>> Keep out certificate, try to send email and if it works qmail and >>> spamdyke configuration it's correct. >>> >>> And then try to use the certificate... >>> >>> It's my opinion. >>> >>> Jose >>> >>> >>> 2011/6/10 Eric Shubert<e...@shubes.net>: >>>> I think Ron's in the process of trying a cert signed by a registered CA >>>> instead of using a self signed cert. >>>> >>>> On 06/10/2011 07:50 AM, Jose Galvez wrote: >>>>> Have you used your mail server without ssl certificate? >>>>> What message appears at the side of your customer? Can you share that >>>>> with us? >>>>> >>>>> Jose >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/6/10 Eric Shubert<e...@shubes.net>: >>>>>> Ron eliminated softlimit entirely, and still has the error. >>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion though. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -Eric 'shubes' >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06/10/2011 05:11 AM, BC wrote: >>>>>>> There is something else amiss here, from my reading of the logs. If >>>>>>> there is gobs of memory available, then do as Sam suggests and >>>>>>> allocate a LOT - say 300mb to the softlimit and retest. I'd wager >>>>>>> there will still be troubles. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/9/2011 11:54 AM, spamdyke-users-requ...@spamdyke.org wrote: >>>>>>>> So instead of hitting the spamdyke timeout, it hit a timeout on the i/o >>>>>>>> operation. Still doesn't point to the root cause. :( >>>>>>>> Why softlimit doesn't issue some sort of error message is beyond me. >>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>> still inclined to ditch it. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> -Eric 'shubes' >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
