tcp.smtp is not so flexible. "man tcprules" says this:
Address ranges:
tcprules treats 1.2.3.37-53:ins as an abbreviation for the
rules
1.2.3.37:ins, 1.2.3.38:ins, and so on up through 1.2.3.53:ins.
Simi-
larly, 10.2-3.:ins is an abbreviation for 10.2.:ins and 10.3.:ins.
On 01/31/2013 09:28 AM, Linux wrote:
> Sorry my friends for the trouble and being offtopic to spamdyke
> handled properly so you as the notation of a network segment tcp.smtp?
>
> example: 192.168.0.1/19
>
> is
>
> HostMin: 192.168.0.1
> HostMax: 192.168.31.254
>
>
> correct notation is
>
> 192.168.0-192.168.31.: Allow
>
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Thanks and sorry for not being completely on the topic.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pablo
>
> 2013/1/31 Linux <distribucionlinux-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org>:
>> Eric thank you very much :) , very clarifying your information.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>> 2013/1/31 Eric Shubert <ejs-mdyvq9ofcysstnjn9+b...@public.gmane.org>:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2013 08:51 AM, Linux wrote:
>>>> Hello friends, I want to include a segment on my whitelist ip but do
>>>> not know which format to use,
>>>>
>>>> this is valid?
>>>>
>>>> 192.168.1.0/20
>>>>
>>>> or is another format?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help
>>>>
>>>
>>> The format is quite flexible:
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README_ip_file_format.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> spamdyke-users-/x2b3zmi7jpg9huczpv...@public.gmane.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
--
-Eric 'shubes'
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
