Actually, temporary rejections are only sent when the rejection could be caused 
by a DNS failure or timeout.  Everything else is permanent.  Specifically, 
these filters send permanent error codes:
        dns-blacklist-entry
        dns-blacklist-file
        filter-level
        greeting-delay-secs
        header-blacklist-entry
        header-blacklist-file
        ip-blacklist-entry
        ip-blacklist-file
        ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry
        ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file
        rdns-blacklist-dir
        rdns-blacklist-entry
        rdns-blacklist-file
        recipient-blacklist-entry
        recipient-blacklist-file
        reject-identical-sender-recipient
        reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
        rhs-blacklist-entry
        rhs-blacklist-file
        sender-blacklist-entry
        sender-blacklist-file

These filters send temporary error codes:
        connection-timeout-secs
        graylist-level
        idle-timeout-secs
        max-recipients
        reject-empty-rdns
        reject-missing-sender-mx
        reject-unresolvable-rdns

But to answer your question, I doubt sending permanent error codes will make 
the spammers stop.  In my experience, they don't seem to care whether their 
emails go through or not; I guess they get paid just for making the attempt.  
If you want to change a filter from sending a temporary error to a permanent 
one, you can edit spamdyke.h starting around line 516.  You'll see each 
rejection message is defined over three lines of code.  Find the one you want 
to change and replace REJECT_SEVERITY_TEMPORARY with REJECT_SEVERITY_PERMANENT. 
 Re-run "make", reinstall the spamdyke binary and you're done.

Good luck!

-- Sam Clippinger




On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:

> Sam,
> 
> I suppose that all rejects are sent back as temporary failures.  Is it 
> possible to select specific ones and send back as permanent?  For 
> example, I have two spam sites that pound my server daily over several 
> years.  Do you think sending back permanent errors will dissuade these 
> sites or at least have them not continuously retry?
> 
> Gary
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to