On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:04:22 +0100 "Jurzitza, Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seing the communication between Jurij and Dave I took a glance into the > 2.4.29 - tree and found the identical code segment as discussed below. This > tells me that 2.4.X is supposed to suffer from the same issues as you tracked > down for 2.6.X, isn't it? However, what I did not find is > include/asm-sparc64/compat.h; this made me wonder whether I should expect a > basic difference here, but maybe I simply misunderstood. It's in arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c and arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c and I've already fixed it in my local tree which will push over to Marcelo soon. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
