From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:28:59 +0200
> Sure. While we're at it, is there a specific reason various sbus > drivers reimplement i2c functionality instead of using the common > code? There wer no suitable i2c client registry, sharing, and mutual exclusion facilities in the i2c layer at the time. That has, of course, changed. Another problem is that the device probing this driver wants to do is via the string names that are in the firmware device tree, and the i2c layer has no way for me to really plug in that stuff. Anyways, I'll apply this patch, thanks a lot. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
