> from looking at the CVS tree and the latest pre-patch it looks as if
> the two are back in sync WRT the SPARC architecture. Am i correct?
Even though they are in sync, only sun4c has a chance of running (once
procfs is fixed to not assume alloc_task == get_free_pages).
> Simply omitting "__flush_dcache_range()" and applying step 1 and 2 gives me
> a clean compile up to srmmu.c...
We are working on srmmu right at the moment :)
Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
