> The patch looks something, but not exactly, like as below (I don't have the
> original file handy for a true diff.) The effects on the i86 platform is a
> need to either re-create existing raid arrays or make some upgrade
> utility--which is most likely why nothing has been done about it (since
> there are many existing i86 raid systems out there.)
Please don't do this. I'm working on a proper solution, will post it here
once I'm ready.
>
> <>< Lance.
>
> --- md_p.old.h Wed Feb 23 22:45:33 2000
> +++ md_p.h Tue Jan 25 11:53:24 2000
> @@ -127,8 +127,8 @@
> __u32 working_disks; /* 3 Number of working disks
> */
> __u32 failed_disks; /* 4 Number of failed disks
> */
> __u32 spare_disks; /* 5 Number of spare disks
> */
> - __u32 sb_csum; /* 8 checksum of the whole superblock
> */
> __u64 events; /* 6 number of superblock updates (64-bit!)
> */
> + __u32 sb_csum; /* 8 checksum of the whole superblock
> */
> __u32 gstate_sreserved[MD_SB_GENERIC_STATE_WORDS - 9];
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
> the body of the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/~jj
Linux version 2.3.47 on a sparc64 machine (1343.49 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
