I see the modification N[115], but not the color coding and also the
calculation at the bottom of the page for # NxS/T peptides vs total #
peptides is empty. I find this to be very useful when calculating
specificity of our capturing method. If i know it is a bug, then I'll wait
for a fix. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't supposed to be clicking any
more buttons to get it to show up.

Thanks!
Rebekah

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, dshteynb...@systemsbiology.org <
dshteynb...@systemsbiology.org> wrote:

> Hello Ruby,
>
> I believe this problem is only with the ProteinProphet viewer not the
> modelling.  Someone else had reported this problem also but it has not been
> fixed in this release.  The problem is in the coloring off the motif only.
>  You should still see the motif in the peptides you identify.
>
> -David
>
> Sent from my Android Device
>
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Ruby" <rubycell7...@gmail.com>
> To: "spctools-discuss" <spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: [spctools-discuss] GLYC not working in 4.5.2?
> Date: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 6:51 am
>
>
> I have been using the GLYC command in TPP 4.4.0 for more than a year
> with no problem. I recently upgraded to TPP 4.5.2 and can't seem to
> get the GLYC command to work for ProteinProphet. I have the "N-
> glycosylation data (color NXS/T)" option checked in petunia when doing
> ProteinProphet processing, and in the ProteinProphet header the "NxS/
> T" box is checked. However, I do NOT see any pink highlighted N[115]
> in the peptides like I used to see nor does it calculate the # of
> glycopeptides at the bottom of the page - though most of my peptides
> do contain this modification. I am selecting the option to use the
> "Use N-glyc motif information" when I do the peptideprophet.
>
> Is there something else I"m supposed to be doing to get this to work
> in the new update of TPP?
>
> Thanks
> Ruby
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to