Hi David,

An update just in case anyone else has run into our issue: I copied the 
PTMProphetParser.exe from a 6.0.0 installation over into our current 5.2.0 
installation, and everything is working great thus far! 

Thank you for the tip, I appreciate the assistance.

Respectfully,
-Will

On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 8:46:35 PM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:

> Hi Will,
>
> There is a release candidate for version 6.0.0 available on sourceforge:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/sashimi/files/Trans-Proteomic%20Pipeline%20%28TPP%29/TPP%20v6.0%20%28Release%20Candidates%29/
>
> If you do end up trying it let me know if you find any issues.  
>
> Thanks!
> -David
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:14 PM Will Comstock <wc...@cornell.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I'll attempt to re-run PTMProphet analysis on a few problematic datasets 
>> with MAXTHREADS=1. 
>>
>> I am currently using the version of PTMProphet that came with the 
>> installation of TPP 5.2. Is there a newer version available that I could be 
>> using instead?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>> -Will
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 7:37:58 PM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Will, 
>>>
>>> We routinely run PTMProphet on datasets containing multiple hundreds of 
>>> thousands of PSMs. This looks like multithreading issue 
>>> related MAXTHREADS=0 parameter, this should not happen if you use 
>>> MAXTHREADS=1.  I have corrected several bugs related to multithreading in 
>>> the codebase. Which version of PTMProphet are you using? 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:59 PM Will Comstock <wc...@cornell.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I've run into an issue with PTMProphet where occasionally the command 
>>>> will fail for unknown reasons and the resulting ptm.pep.xml cannot be 
>>>> opened with the PepXML viewer. The command log seems to cut off abruptly, 
>>>> as pictured in the attached screenshot. Also attached is the page that 
>>>> appears upon trying to open the ptm.pep.xml. 
>>>>
>>>> The interact.pep.xml files we're analyzing clock in at about 200 to 250 
>>>> megabytes. As a workaround, we currently just split the initial batch of 
>>>> pep.xmls into smaller groups before running PeptideProphet and PTMProphet 
>>>> on them again. Sometimes we end up with batches of pep.xmls as small as 3 
>>>> or 4 files, which is somewhat inconvenient for projects with hundreds of 
>>>> RAW files. 
>>>>
>>>> Is there another way around this issue? We've tried running it through 
>>>> the command line as well and this problem still crops up frequently.
>>>> [image: PTMproph_CommandFailed.png]
>>>> [image: PTMproph_CommandFailed_xmlError.png]
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/020c5be3-14ad-4350-9b12-dbb366fdb2c8n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/020c5be3-14ad-4350-9b12-dbb366fdb2c8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/22052f7c-d0d9-494e-8208-b49b29fb8321n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/22052f7c-d0d9-494e-8208-b49b29fb8321n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/b5eceb74-1e34-4c71-9f09-27b1e266ec89n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to