Hi Didier, I’m a bit lost on where this email started (not on the SPDX-legal mailing list, perhaps), but in any case, your license request is not lost :)
It’s status on the tracking Google worksheet was, however, incorrectly noted as being included on v2.3, which it clearly was not. Consulting the past meeting minutes, I’m quite sure it was never discussed. Therefore, I have updated the tracking worksheet to note it as “under review” and we will discuss it on the next legal call. Thanks for bringing to our attention and sorry for the unnecessary delay! Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensou...@jilayne.com > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Didier Verna <did...@lrde.epita.fr> wrote: > > Colin Macdonald <c...@math.ubc.ca> wrote: > >> I noticed that All-Permissive's status is "accepted for v2.3". But >> version 2.3 is out and its not on the list. Other licenses with the >> same status tag (e.g., curl, Info-ZIP) *are* on the list. >> >> I checked the git repo and I see no mention of All-Permissive. >> >> Has it slipped through the cracks somehow? I notice it comes after a >> bunch of rejected licenses on the online spreadsheet... >> >> Just trying to help and apologies for the waste of time if its lined-up >> for v2.4. > > Yup, thanks for keeping me posted. It appears to be neither in the > accepted list, nor in the "under consideration" one, so it seems to be > lost... > > -- > Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. > > Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info > _______________________________________________ > Spdx-legal mailing list > Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org > https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal _______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
