On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:51:45PM -0400, Wheeler, David A wrote: > But in that case, I think there needs to be a *speedy* assignment > (hah!) of a SPDX license id/expression to the React.js license.
There's some previous discussion of that license in [1,2]. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292 https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2015-June/002717.html Subject: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Date: Mon Jun 15 03:58:53 UTC 2015 [2]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-June/002008.html Subject: New OSI approved license Date: Sun Jun 4 03:47:02 UTC 2017 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
