This interests me also. It's my impression, from both the license-list explanation and the actual list, that SPDX casts a broader net than either OSI or FSF. Substantial compliance is sufficient.
I also note: The SPDX Legal Team endeavors to explain its reasoning, analysis, and conclusions with respect to a candidate license as a means of developing precedent. Compare and contrast a very recent conversation on OSI's license-review, starting here: http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-September/003535.html -- Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2385): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2385 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/26425511/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
