Hi David, Good timing: the BigScience Open RAIL-M License was just submitted for consideration a few days ago. [1]
The license inclusion principles [2] contemplate that licenses to be added to the list might include software licenses as well as data-focused licenses. I haven't taken a look at this one in any detail yet, but I'd assume that it would be considered under the inclusion principles in the same manner as other software- and/or data-focused licenses. Best, Steve [1] https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1622 [2] https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/DOCS/license-inclusion-principles.md On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 10:18 AM David Kemp <dk1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, has SPDX been requested to or considered assigning > identifiers to artificial intelligence software licenses? I ran across the > Stable Diffusion README, which contains the following: > > The CreativeML OpenRAIL M license > <https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/blob/main/LICENSE> is an Open > RAIL M license > <https://www.licenses.ai/blog/2022/8/18/naming-convention-of-responsible-ai-licenses>, > adapted from the work that BigScience <https://bigscience.huggingface.co/> > and the RAIL Initiative <https://www.licenses.ai/> are jointly carrying > in the area of responsible AI licensing. See also the article about the > BLOOM Open RAIL license > <https://bigscience.huggingface.co/blog/the-bigscience-rail-license> on > which our license is based. > > I don't know much about AI/ML, but it's still a fascinating topic. > > V/R, > David > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3244): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/3244 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/93525849/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
