Hi all, In light of our discussion on our last call about how to make it easier and faster to get licenses reviewed (and adhere to our 3 “votes” from spdx-legal members for a license to be included), I’m sending a list of license submission issues that have at least one person reviewed below - please have a look and add your thoughts!
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1706 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1614 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1612 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1611 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1606 https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1550 (analysis done for this one and is similar to #1551, so view together) https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1551 Note - not all of these used the license submission template. Relatedly, I used the new version of that on a couple and although the check boxes are an improvement, I still find it a bit clunky and slow. I am not sure if this is a biased view b/c I have so much historical knowledge, but I do think some of the factors are sort of “n/a” in some cases and you know that from the initial submission. That being said, I’m not sure I have any good ideas as to how to make it shorter or faster… yet…. Thanks! Jilayne -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3276): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/3276 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/95055362/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
