In today's call, Gary sir mentioned that there is a possibility that OtherLicenses could have both licenseText and extractedText fields as OtherLicense derives properties from a base class.
Referring SPDX-UML-2.2.1 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/blob/development/v2.2.1/model/SPDX-UML-Class-Diagram.jpg>, OtherLicense (ExtractedLicenseInfo) inherits from SimpleLicensingInfo which in-turn inherits from AnyLicenseInfo. Any of the parents of the OtherLicense doesn't have the "licenseText" property. Renaming extractedText to licenseText shouldn't affect the semantics of the SPDX model. Correct me if I am wrong. Rishabh Bhatnagar -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3920): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3920 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/77202477/21656 Group Owner: spdx-tech+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
