Greetings all,
I would like to ask before the tech call this week you review the following before participating in the discussion on namespace maps: * Last tech call minutes - around line 58 in https://spdx.swinslow.net/p/spdx-tech-minutes * Last week's serialization team minutes around line 23 in https://spdx.swinslow.net/p/spdx-tech-minutes * Sean's PR containing a proposed solution using the namespace map https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/pull/490 * My attempt at creating a PR implementation of Max's proposed solution (If Max has time before the call, he may update the PR to better reflect the proposal) https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/pull/491 Please note: the class named "X" is temporary. We agreed on a prior serialization call not to name the class until we finished defining the semantics. On the tech call, we plan to choose between these 2 proposals. We will base our decision on how well it supports the use cases we discussed in previous calls and other criteria such as complexity to understand and complexity to implement. Thanks, Gary -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5326): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5326 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/101160591/21656 Group Owner: spdx-tech+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
