For tomorrow's tech call, I have some topics I would like to discuss: * Issue 651 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/651> : Conflicting property names prevents compaction * Issue 572 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/572> : Confirm we have consensus on the data license - I think we can close this issue
After reviewing all the open issues, there are a few candidates for discussion on our call: * Issue 630 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/630> : Consider extensibility for package "file" types * Integrity Method related issues and PR's - Issue 595 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/595> , * Issue 561 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/561> : Add Software Level of Support property to Software Package * Issue 522 <https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/522> : Expressing conformance constraints - should this be moved to 3.1? There are quite a few open issues and pull requests that we need to clean up for the final SPDX 3.0 release (in addition to anything we find in the RC2 review). I would encourage each of the profile teams to filter the open issues and pull requests on the profile labels and review / resolve / update. If you decide to push the resolution to 3.1, please update the milestone. Best regards, Gary -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5554): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5554 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/104738806/21656 Group Owner: spdx-tech+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
