As a community, we are still struggling with where to draw the boundary between what is generally accepted and thus should be standardized, and what is still unknown enough and thus needs competition to figure out what the best approach is and for what use cases.

It appears that we agree on for sure:
 - discovery (aka Yadis)
 - shared-secret-based authentication (aka OpenID authentication)

It appears that we might be able to reach consensus on:
- a minimal vocabulary (at least I have not heard different factions argue in favor of different, competing, vocabularies, for reasons other than the next item ... see below ...)

So far, there has been disagreement on:
- the underlying data model for vocabularies (based on tree, a directed graph, or simply name-value pairs)
 - the timing and triggers that cause data to move
 - the mechanisms by which data moves.

Depending on the day of the week, we seem to all be more or less confident on whether we can (or should, at this time!) get agreement on the things that we don't always agree on.

I would agree with you that we should avoid premature standardization for things that don't have sufficient consensus yet.

Others argue that it is better to pick one of the alternatives as a standard, and fix it later if needed, than to not have a standardized facility for an important function (an argument that I understand).

The current approach seems to be to go down the standardization route and see how far we can go. It is certainly possible that as we go down that route and improve the proposed specs, some of the objections will disappear ...

On Sep 26, 2006, at 0:36, Martin Atkins wrote:

Johannes Ernst wrote:
I thought we had consensus that Drummond and I owned the
vocabularies/ontologies/schema/whatever-we-call-it action item?


The more the merrier, in my opinion.
Let the market decide!


_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general

Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.

GIF image

 http://netmesh.info/jernst




_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

Reply via email to