Forgive my lack of Yadis configuration expertise, but is this something that your average blogger can add to their WP or MT blog?
-- Dick On 18-Oct-06, at 7:28 AM, Recordon, David wrote: > At that point then I'd argue that the feature shouldn't be supported; > Yadis was developed to handle use cases like this. While HTML-based > Discovery is certainly easier, I'm happy not adding to it beyond what > was in 1.1 and telling people to use Yadis when they need something > more > complex. I think that is a good balance between light-weight > discovery > and features. > > --David > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dick Hardt > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:27 AM > To: Drummond Reed > Cc: specs@openid.net > Subject: Re: Question: multiple IdPs? > > Thanks Drummond, but what if I am using HTML-based discovery? (that is > what I am going to use in my vanity domain, much easier to implement) > > http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-10.html#html_disco > > -- Dick > > On 17-Oct-06, at 11:46 PM, Drummond Reed wrote: > >> In the directed identity case, the IdP URL or XRI you give to the RP >> resolves to your IdP's XRDS document. Each of your IdPs would have a >> different one. If they support directed identity, each would have a >> Service with a Type tag value of >> http://openid.net/identifier_select/2.0. This service endpoint would >> not have an OpenID:Delegate tag (or if it does the spec should be >> clear that it is ignored for this service type) since this service >> provides directed identity authentication for everyone at that IdP. >> >> =Drummond >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Dick Hardt >> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:25 PM >> To: specs@openid.net >> Subject: Question: multiple IdPs? >> >> I would like to use different IdPs for my vanity URL, blame.ca. In an >> OpenID 2.0 world, I can provide either of my IdP URLs to the RP and >> then select blame.ca and login. >> >> Does this work? What having two openid.server tags suffice? How would >> the RP know which delegate tag goes with which IdP? The spec is not >> silent on this. >> >> ( and yes, another argument for having one identifier so that the RP >> does not have to figure out anything about the delegate tag since it >> does not do anything with it anyway!) >> >> -- Dick >> _______________________________________________ >> specs mailing list >> specs@openid.net >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > specs@openid.net > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs > > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
