Recordon, David wrote:
Combining this with the fact that there is no viable way to enforce sections 8.1 or A.4 being MUSTs, I do not believe that they should be changed from SHOULDs. The only conceivable way I could see of enforcing something like this is telling a Relying Party that they cannot use OpenID Authentication if they don't follow these non-essential markup requirements; that is not something I am willing to do.
"Be liberal in what you accept, be conservative in what you send."
Enforcement is not a requirement. Having said that, I think I agree with you: SHOULD is probably strong enough to ensure that those who can, will.
-- Pete
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
