On 10/19/06, Dick Hardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you want that to happen, then you have to spec out that the RP is > verifying the IdP-specific identifier and portable identifier binding > when it receives it. That is not in the current proposal.
If that is not in there, then the proposal *is* worse than one-identifier and needs to be fixed. I guess I need to read it more closely. The primary reason that I prefer two-identifier is that the relying party is more strict about what it's accepting. Josh _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
