Recordon, David wrote: > > http://specs.openid.net/authentication/2.0/signon > http://specs.openid.net/authentication/2.0/server > http://specs.openid.net/authentication/2.0/identifier_select
These seem just fine to me. (+1, I guess!) > So very verbose and organized. There is no need for an xmlns for the > Auth 2.0 spec itself, since unlike the 1.1 spec which defined > "OpenID:Delegate" in Yadis, 2.0 takes advantage of the "LocalID" element > already defined in the XRD schema. I missed the change to using LocalID. I'm glad to see that change, but really just because I've always hated the fact that it was called "Delegate" in Yadis. :) > http://specs.openid.net/extensions/ABBREV/VERSION This naming scheme doesn't separate out extensions by what they're extending. Presumably in future we're going to have other non-extension specs (that is, they don't actually use the OpenID Authentication request as a transport) which will themselves have extensions. How about, http://specs.openid.net/authentication/2.0/exten/simplereg/1.0 I've not got my heart set on abbreviating "extensions", but I don't really like URLs that are longer than one line in a plaintext email because then people start wrapping them over multiple lines. :) _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs