hey jaromil,
i think that many, many flowers should be allowed to blossom in the
pastures of our networks. and i think it is interesting to see that
there is no natural consensus about the reading and the evaluation of
critical artistic practice. we had a discussion on the german
rohrpost recently about the relevance of copyright and remuneration
systems because there was a letter by a pro-copyright group of
writers posted to the list. for me it is important that william's
failure, or unwillingness, to see the dark humour in the 'slavery'
action by the yesmen is a valid reaction, too. remember that the
syndicate had room for people like tisma, and antiorp, and everyone
else. we can also not expect that everyone who is on the spectre list
today is aware of 10 or so years of rtmark 'oeuvres'. it feels
sisyphean, but then that's life. and reminds us of the beauty of
repetition.
regards,
-a
hey Andreas,
should we adapt the network to curators, or curators to the network?
i like the choice to be yours here, this is not going like syndicate ;)
mr William,
did you ever had a closer look to some net-art ? rtmark, the yes man,
e-toy ... i recommend it, interesting expressions of our mediatically
troubled times.
ciao
- --
jaromil, dyne.org rasta coder, http://afrolinux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFZrZHe2QxhLU0C14RAhuJAKDb3Z5vxG+RTO85dPWcOgLuzUd/ogCg4y8P
6TI+ly2D8QkkBBrfupR8hrw=
=n18w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre
______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre
