At the beginning I think it's pretty normal to be able to do
algorithms from only one angle (usuallu FR slot), but you'll manage to
do F2L from more and more angles with time.
Resulting that you won't need many cube rotations at the end (cube
rotations are not very good because you lose too much time, but you'll
manage do minimise the number of cube rotations you do with time and
training.)
Gilles.
2006/1/27, Marco Garbelini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm starting to play around with Fridrich F2L as well.
>
> How about cube rotations and regrips? Should I stick to the same cube
> orientation all the way? I keep rotating and regripping all the time, or at
> least I'm tempted to.
>
> Cheers,
> Marco
>
>
> On 1/27/06, Gilles van den Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > When you start with F2L intuitively, it's completely normal to be
> > quite slow at the beginning.
> > When I did that too, I did the same as you : playing with the pieces
> > so that I luckily find a basic case.
> > But then with time you'll find ways to improve your solution for any
> > case. Just give it time and you'll be fine (I never learned any F2L
> > alg and yet I can do them around 11 seconds on average.)
> >
> > Good luck !
> > Gilles.
> >
> >
> > 2006/1/27, David Pritts < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I am starting to get the hang of intuitive F2L! (it sorta just started
> > to click after i struggled through it, looking at the four "algorithms"
> > repeatedly). Now I can solve 3 corners with this method without too much
> > trouble, although it's still not fast. My old method is still MUCH faster
> > than this.
> > >
> > > Question: Generally I have some difficulty inserting the last pair
> > into the F2L. Tips? How do I form one of the "fundamental F2L cases" when I
> > am so limited in my ability to move the pieces around?
> > >
> > > I have been able to do it before, but the last one frequently takes a
> > long time... I am realy unable to plan it out (although I am starting to get
> > better at actually planning out the first 3, rather than just moving
> > rnadomly aroudn until I recognize a pattern), and I sort of just play with
> > it for a while. Will I just get better at this? How long will I have to use
> > F2L until I get "relatively fast" at it (ie, less than 45 seconds in my
> > case)
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
