I would not say it heavily weighs your chances, it's more of a lower- bound cutoff threshold. A 1400+ can get you in anywhere, and a 1500+ is considered safe if you're going for an Ivy or an equivalent in terms of admissions difficulty.
--- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SAT is a standaradized test taken by american's and it heavily weighs > what university they can get into... > > Craig > > --- In [email protected], "Gunnar Krig" > <gunkr520@> wrote: > > > > What is SAT score?? > > > > /Gunnar > > > > --- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard" > > <logitewty@> wrote: > > > > > > Leyan, I thought the highest SAT score was 1501??? or have they > > > changed it to 1601??? And what was ur SAT score??? 1590??? > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Rune Wesström > > > <rune.wesstrom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, it would be bad. But no time for sorry; you and I have shown > > > that we have more common sense than the rest. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "thomkirjava" <snkenjoi@> > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 2:42 PM > > > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: Guess The Number! > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I just stole yours and added a bit so I get everything above > > > > yours:) (Well, for a bit). > > > > > > > > Now if someone said 3456.5, you'd be screwed :P > > > > > > > > ~Thom > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Rune Wesström > > > > <rune.wesstrom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Are you using mr Pochmanns strategy? > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "thomkirjava" <snkenjoi@> > > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 1:35 PM > > > > > Subject: [Speed cubing group] Re: Guess The Number! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3458.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Craig Bouchard" > > > > > > <logitewty@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the guessing, I thought he was just doing 2000 as fast > as he > > > > > > > could...not go for 24 hours and see how many he has > solved...But > > > > if he > > > > > > > goes for the full 24 hours, I'd say... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24 hours: 3758 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2000 Cubes: 14 hours 21 minutes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See how accurate these guesses are when we roll around to the > > > final > > > > > > > counts... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], GameOfDeath2 > > > > > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Stefan > > Pochmann" > > > > > > > <pochmann@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Stefan > > > > Pochmann" > > > > > > > > > <pochmann@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What the ...??? > > > > > > > > > > http://stefan-pochmann.de/foo/brent_1000.JPG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, you guys much better write "1000 solved!" > > > > > > > > > instead of "1000! solved". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Pochmann, professional nitpicker > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good call! Even working in binary that still makes > > > > 1001110110000000 > > > > > > > cubes. > > > > > > > > Perhaps a base smaller than 2 is being used, e.g. base > > > > > > > cbrt(Gamma^{-1}(1000)-1). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
