On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:15:47PM -0000, cmhardw wrote:
> Hey Ryan,
>
> I think doing something like this is alright for the 3x3x3, you can
> still get some really fast times, but I would hate the idea of also
> using it for the 5x5x5. Storing all that information by rote for
> the 5x5x5 would take me twice as long as using the stories I use,
To be clear, I'm not advocating "rote memorisation" either. That means
memorising something using a process of repetition, without necessarily
comprehending what is being memorised. This is also unappealing to me.
What I am talking about is memorisation by analysis of the material in
its native domain.
With the amount of brain mass that is dedicated to visual processing, it
is hard to believe that there isn't enough of it to break down the
structure of a cube visually.
Much less of our brain is dedicated to auditory processing, yet in one
second, a human brain can identify and memorise the equivalent of more
than half the information content of 1 cube, within an audio signal.
Ryan
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
