> > >>Maybe it would be worth to comapare Rev. 0.00 windows driver with Rev. >>0.01 and check if there are any >>differencies .... >> >> Brief look into Windows driver revealed that it may behave differrently according to the revision of modem (POTS/ISDN). This is from some phonebook file located on driver CD:
<...> [Modem.POTS] ModemMode=11 [Modem.ISDN] ModemMode=3 <...> Don't have idea what's ModemMode but maybe it's important for correct modem initialation (OTOH maybe not ...). I also sniffed USB packets when uploading firmware. Unfortunately when sniffing in Windows 98 large part of URBs was missing (guess this is issue of sniffer and slow machine). So I connected modem to my Win2k machine (no DSL line though, the cable is too short).This time everything went smoothly. I tracked down the "magic sequence" used in modem_run to initialize modem. I discovered one more similar URB following this sequence: 00045944 11.83704968 >>>>>>> URB 187 going down... 00045947 11.83707371 TransferBufferLength = 00000001 00045951 11.83710611 0000: 03 Hmm, maybe this data (0x03) has somthing to do with ModemType=3 00045952 11.83711226 UrbLink = 00000000 00045953 11.83711924 RequestTypeReservedBits = 00 00045954 11.83712567 Request = 01 00045955 11.83713265 Value = 0011 00045956 11.83713936 Index = 0000 .... 00045966 11.83999670 SetupPacket : 40 01 11 00 00 00 01 00 Then there are too more Setup Packets 00045991 11.84207183 SetupPacket : c0 26 f7 00 00 00 0e 00 ... 00046017 11.84513143 SetupPacket : c0 26 6b 00 00 00 1a 00 I modified modem_run to send this voodoo to the modem. The modem seems to accept it, but it has no effect on my problem. Maybe there are more differences. Can anyone provide me log of Rev 0.00 modem so I can use it as reference? The logs are avaible in zip files at my school server if anyone is interested: http://decef.elf.stuba.sk/~ak99387/log/speedtouch98.log.zip (cca 500kB, there is "magic" part missing) http://decef.elf.stuba.sk/~ak99387/log/speedtouchNT.log.zip (cca 800kB, the modem was not connected to DSL line) Duncan Sands wrote: >Another thing to do would be to use something like usbsnoopy to watch >the traffic in windows when you download the all-ones file. > It is the next thing on my To Do list ... >Also, if >you have vmware (running on linux, containing windows), see if the >windows driver can successfully use the modem. If so, that shows that >the problem is not in the linux usb core (vmware sends urbs using >usbfs, the same as the user space driver). > I doubt if vmware would even start on that computer, but when I'll be desparate enough I give it a try. Best regards Andrej Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]