On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:12:06 +0100 Frank Ellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> http://new.openspf.org/FAQ >[...] >> Please have a look. > >Proclaiming the failure of Sender ID with a broken link is bad. > > Which question was that in? > >The financial side page appears twice. The "underscore" page >is bogus, simply kill it. DNS always supported all octets, >only fully qualified host names are restricted to "LDH" (as >explained in RfC 3696).
The 'The basics' section repeats more than one question. This is on purpose with the idea that some will only read that section. For the '_' question, I figure on leaving it in for the moment as updated. When we switch to the new FAQ, I don't want to leave anything out from the old. Always legit or not, a lot of people don't know that. Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
