On 05/11/2006 21:47, Julian Mehnle wrote: > _If_ we introduce the concept of "?" to the "Introduction" page, then I'd > prefer the former. However, _do_ we want to introduce the "?" concept at > this basic level? The example record is meant to be "demonstrative" more > than "realistic" in order to convey the big picture of SPF, not so much > the details. One could argue "include:" to be an unnecessary detail, too, > though (and I wouldn't even be against removing the "include:" from the > example). > > What do others think? > I think whatever is in the intro will get cut and pasted and used. The same people who would do that are the same ones that need to have some understanding of cross-user forgery.
So, I think ?include: goes in the intro with an appropriate explanation. Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
