> I get your point, but if I recall correctly, Sphinx handles this by > automatically postfixing files that have identical names (e.g. > file.jpg, file1.jpg, ...).
I tried it, and renaming files (by postfixing with a number) is exactly what Sphinx does. This handles it, but to me renaming files doesn't "feel" right - I would prefer that Sphinx kept the original directory structure and filenames. There is no benefit in changing the original directory structure and filenames when the documentation is build. There is no association back to the original location of the image files, and this is potentially confusing when the author of the documentation tries to relate the generated HTML back to his/her source. Having said that, I think in practice it is an annoyance rather than a major problem, and we are still very keen on Sphinx. I've opened issue #290 on this, for what it's worth. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=.
